In keeping with our mission, there are issues which must be resolved so
that democratic control of the Socorro Electric Cooperative can be established
and assured in the future.
1. UNNESSARY EXPENSES
•
The SEC Board does not need 11 members to operate. The County Comission
gets by with 5. Reducing the Board from 11 to 7 or even 5 would save a
good bit of money and probably make the Board more efficient. Reduce monthly
meeting from two to one. Do away with committees and have the smallerBoard
function as a Committee of the Whole.
The cost of each trustee by district from 1/1/2006 to 6/31/2008 is shown
on this chart. Costs include per diem, tax, lodging, mileage, insurance,
air fares, registration fees, course tuitions, and subscriptions. First
term trustees are expected to cost more than trustees who have served
more than one term due to training requirements. But as you can see by
the asterisk (*) beside their names (each * = 10 or more years on the
board) several continue to incur high costs. Committee appointees incur
more costs because they attend more meetings and Socorro City Trustees
are the majority on all but two committees. Each twice monthly meeting
and every committee meeting attended earns $60.00 for a trustee. If one
resides in the city, there is no expense incurred by attendance and the
meetings seldom last an hour. Trustees attending from outside Socorro
City limits are also reimbursed mileage, at the federal rate, and a meal
allowance of $15.00. The committee reports reveal that little is achieved
by the committees that could not have been accomplished by a staff member
or the board as a whole in a matter of minutes. To the majority of the
board committee meetings like the twice monthly regular meetings are just
more gravy.
2. OPEN MEETINGS:
•
Socorro Electric Cooperative Policy # 22 approved 3/2/1998: Visitors
to Meetings of the Board of Trustees stated:
• "Members of SEC have the privilege
of attending meeting of the Board of Trustees so as to observe and become
familiar with the Board’s role in conducting the affairs of the
Cooperative.
• If a Member wants to be recognized
or has a matter to bring before the Board, he/she must have given prior
notice and received authorization to address the Board and state the subject,
prior to the meeting.
• On 11/30/05, shortly before three newly elected trustees joined
the Board, the sitting Trustees changed the above policy to repeal the
first sentence leaving only the second sentence to apply to visitors giving
prior notice and receiving authorization to attend the meeting. The trustees
who were present and voted for this amendment were: Juan Gonzales, Paul
Bustamante, Leroy Anaya, Milton Ulibarri, Manual Marques, and Dave Wade.
Leo Cordova and Jack Bruton were absent.
• Laws in New Mexico which apply to public meetings are defined
in State law as “The Open Meetings Act,” NMSA 1978, Chapter
10, Article 15. Rural electric cooperatives (RECs) may not be subject
to this law because they are privately owned by their members for a commercial
purpose (that of providing electric power to their members for the benefit
of their members at cost). RECs are governed by their members through
the co-ops bylaws and are subject to both Federal and State law. They
are regulated by the Rural Utility Service ( an agency of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture) and the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission. The rules
and regulations of lenders also come into play because co-ops depend on
long term credit from both Federal and private sources.
• Assuming that none of these lenders or governmental entities require
open meetings, the decision to require open meetings still remains in
the hands of the members of the co-op either through the Bylaws or the
Policy Manual. Changes in bylaws can be proposed by members or their elected
representatives (Trustees) but any amendment, repeal or alterations of
the Bylaws must be ratified by a vote of the members.
The Board of Trustees is authorized by the Bylaws to create policies.
If the Board thinks open meetings are in the best interest of the Members
(Cooperative), it can create an Open Meeting Policy by majority vote of
the Board at any Board meeting. The Board can also dedicate a portion
of the meeting to a Members Comment Period allowing members to speak without
prior approval of the Board. Jack Bruton made such a motion according
to the minutes of the April 9, 2008 Board meeting. It was voted down.
3. FAIR ELECTIONS OF TRUSTEES: Redistricting, Amendment
of “Rural Electric Cooperatives,” 62-15-10 NMSA 1978 which
forbids voting by mail to allow not only voting by mail but by phone,
online, and in person.
4. BY-LAW AND POLICY COMPLIANCE: The ignoring and/or
delaying on action called for by the By-Laws and Policy Manual must stop.
In addition the dilution of members’ control by adverse revising
of By-Laws and Policy Manual must be undone by rewriting to make both
documents conform to standards which promote fairness and openness.
5. ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS OF THE COOPERATIVE: House Bill 279, “Utility
Disclosure of Consumer Information” signed into law March 2007 which
was intended to prohibit the unauthorized release of “non-public”
customer information is being used to block the release to members of
all documents.
This Bill is awaiting ruling by the Attorney General of New Mexico.
Also on this matter, NEW MEXICO LAW REVIEW, Winter, 1998, 28 N.M. Law
Rev.133 cites CORPORATE LAW- Formulating and Applying a “Proper
Purpose” Analysis to the case of a Books and Records Inspection
Request-Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc. Aaron
C. Viets. The New Mexico Supreme Court ordered the release of documents
to a member of the Cooperative.
|